Moving 40,000 riders before most cities finish their morning coffee. Route gives transit directors, city councils, and MPOs the operational clarity to make the city move.
214 vehicles on 38 corridors. Zero missed peak-hour runs in the last 8 months. When every bus must move on time, Route's predictive maintenance stack keeps the fleet at 98.7% operational availability — the highest recorded by any BRT operator in the US with fleet >200 vehicles.
Light rail averages $4.20 per boarding. Subway systems average $3.90. Route BRT delivers the same connectivity at $1.84 — a figure that has anchored three successful ballot measures in 2024–2025. Every dollar saved per boarding compounds across 40,000 daily riders into $95,000 in daily system efficiency.
Across all 38 routes and six-minute headways, 94.2% of runs arrive within 90 seconds of schedule. The Airport Express corridor leads at 98%. Real-time dispatch adjustments happen in under 90 seconds — down from the industry average of 4.2 minutes. The city moves because the data moves first.
Transit directors comparing BRT to light rail see one number that ends the conversation: $1.84 cost-per-boarding at 98.7% uptime, deployable in 18 months.
“Route cut our dispatch response time from 4.2 minutes to under 90 seconds. The council approved the lane expansion unanimously after seeing the uptime data.”
“We compared Route against three light rail proposals. Cost-per-boarding at $1.84 versus $4.20 for LRT made the BRT case for us. The ballot measure passed with 64%.”
“214 vehicles, zero missed morning peak runs in eight months. Our on-time performance went from 87% to 94.2% in the first quarter alone.”
47 pages of cost-per-boarding benchmarks, BRT vs. LRT capital comparisons, and ballot measure language used by 12 transit authorities. Used in 3 successful ballot campaigns in 2025.